definition

Cultural Attitudes on Breasts and Bras

March 13th, 2006

I was surfing the internet today and came across a statement to the effect of: “a woman wearing clothes that show cleavage or going without a bra is guaranteed to get male attention”. This was put forth as an advantage, a good thing, something to be desired. Context is not important here, because the fact of the matter is that I see this sexualized attitude towards breasts and bras all the time, and I can’t stand it.

Finding a woman’s breasts attractive is not, in and of itself, inherently a bad thing. It’s an aesthetic disposition that I happen to share. In general, they’ve got a pleasing shape, they’re kind of fun to manipulate, and they tend to be attached to people that I like. Thinking any particular body part is sexy isn’t really the issue here.

The issue is that I cannot choose to wear or not wear certain tops or undergarments, in order to be physically comfortable, without my choice somehow making other people feel entitled to comment, criticize, or stare. The idea is that by wearing clothes which partially reveal my breasts, or by choosing not to wear a bra even beneath “conservative” attire, or even by simply, by virtue of nature, having large mammaries (or, indeed, breasts at all), I have no right to complain if others make degrading or unwanted sexual advances. Somehow, by the mere virtue of being a female who happens to have a couple interestingly-shaped lumps of fat on my chest, I’ve given up all right to be treated with respect or dignity.

There’s really nothing one can do to avoid it. Even if I do all the “right” things, wearing horrible contraptions under my clothes that make me uncomfortable, totally covering anything that could be construed as suggestive or “inappropriate”, constantly hunching over to draw less attention to my chest (the real burden of having breasts — not the weight on your back, not the strain on your shoulders), because they are large, and noticeable, people will still sexualize them and feel entitled to harass me based on their very existence.

On the subject of cleavage? Dude, they’re big. A shirt which shows nothing on a smaller girl still ends up showing cleavage on someone with larger breasts. Unless I cover myself almost up to the neck, there’s going to be a little bit. I don’t have to wear anything with an excessively low neckline in order to achieve the effect; and I’m certainly not going to wear uncomfortably hot clothes in the summer, in 80 degree weather, or even, really, if I just don’t feel like wearing something that covers my entire body. I’m not going to try to hide them and pretend they’re not there and I’m not going to be ashamed that they exist.

On the subject of bras? I think they’re a joke. I find them uncomfortable and unbearable. I haven’t worn one in about three years. Whatever one finds most comfortable, I think, is really key. I have a hard time understanding why anyone would voluntarily wear one, but I don’t understand the appeal of smearing colorful goop one’s face or wearing shoes that are impossible to walk in that cause back pain, either. I kind of like having smooth skin but shaving’s not high on my list of priorities on account of the fact that it takes a lot of time and effort and I get ingrown hairs easily. This is my preference. I don’t really care what other people want to do to themselves. What I do care about is the social expectation, the cultural norm. The idea that I have to do these things which make me uncomfortable and cause me pain, otherwise I am “not taking care of myself” or I’m “asking” for unwanted attention — and that either way, whether I really live up to the standard or not, either way it is still an excuse that my actions make me deserving of harassment and mistreatment.

I think the real problem here is the sexualization of women’s breasts. As I said earlier, I don’t see anything really wrong with finding them sexy, but this is more of an incidental, decentralized kind of attraction, kind of like, “he has nice eyes” or “I think she has sexy elbows” or…whatever. What I mean by the term “sexualization” is the idea that breasts are inherently sexual objects (and therefore at once indecent and also the focus of sexual attention) when, really, breasts are not any more sexual than any other feature of the body. Breasts serve a very specific biological purpose: to feed babies.

Breasts do not exist to be stared at, and their very presence on a person’s body does not suddenly mean that their owner abdicates all right to respect or dignity. The fact that I have breasts is not an invitation for clearly unwanted sexual attention (mostly from straight men) or for verbal abuse (more or less from anyone). There are many issues at work here: the sense of entitlement to women’s bodies, especially on the part of many heterosexual men, but also in general; cultural conformity; the idea that women exist for the sexual pleasure and objectification of men, coupled with the idea that anything sexual is evil and bad. But I don’t have the time and energy to deconstruct all that just now. I’m too tired from even thinking about the vastness of it all.

This attitude about breasts is not really the problem. It’s a symptom of so much else that’s wrong with the world. But, in and of itself, it’s awful enough. In order to avoid this sort of attention, I should not have to try to cover all traces of their shape, their function. Is an organ developed to nurture children really indecent or obscene? What does that say about the priorities of my culture?

For now, some interesting links to pursue:

007b is a site with some good content, but probably NSFW (not that it really should be; it’s just pictures of breastfeeding mothers and the like). Among the highlights are a page on why women wear bras and whether or not there’s really any reason to aside from social pressure, and a gallery of pictures of normal, average breasts showing the variety of shapes and sizes they come in, to try to give the viewer a bit of a sense of perspective.

And then a link I remembered seeing linked at Alas a bit ago, which I think speaks for itself.

Finally, an old fem_rage post which perhaps describes my feelings about the matter more accurately but less articulately and with a lot more cursing.

4 Responses to “Cultural Attitudes on Breasts and Bras”

  1. belledame222 Says:

    A-fucking-men.

    I was informed that I was probably buying the wrong size, like most women; and, after buying some in preparation to go back into the corporate world (ugh), this turned out to be correct. So, the new ones are better, or one of them is. But they’re still miserable objects. At most I like sports bras during exercise or something; yeah, okay, once in a while, the support feels better than not having it. But the rest of the time? contraptions of elastic and itchy lace and god-forbid fucking WIRE, digging into your skina nd leaving angry red weals, for hours at a time? Hate it. HATE.

    The only thing I would add: in my experience, it’s the *women* who end up doing the fashion/body policing, far more than the men. Oh, sure, you get comments on the street from strangers and so on; but for the truly headfucky stuff (Oh, sweetie, if only you would… or, isn’t se, psst psst psst), it’s the womenfolk, ime. Starting with dear ol’ Mom.

    Which doesn’t make it any less traceable back to a patriarchal mindset; but it is perhaps worth considering separately of the “you must do this in order to be sexually attractive by or taken seriously by men.”

  2. adrian Says:

    “when, really, breasts are not any more sexual than any other feature of the body. Breasts serve a very specific biological purpose: to feed babies.”

    I’m not sure where you got that idea from, as it is widely accepted that (large) breasts have evolved to be sexually attractive to men as well as feed babies. Why would nature select for unwieldy lumps of fat which confer no advantage during feeding a child and hinder the mother’s movement? A woman with small breasts is no less capable of breast feeding than one with larger breasts because most of the tissue found in large breasts is deposits of fat rather than mammarial tissue.

    You’re right, it is by virtue of nature that you have these large breasts, but it also by virtue of nature that heterosexual males have a desire for them. It can’t really be avoided any more than you can just take them off when you feel like it.

    All you had to say was “Can’t people have a little social etiquette and manners, or at least be discreet”.

    ————-
    http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/images/breasts.htm provides a couple of mechanisms by which larger breasts became objects of attention for males, and there are plenty of references to similar papers. It’s easy to find more examples out there, you just have to look.

  3. ghost_of_freud Says:

    “it is widely accepted that (large) breasts have evolved to be sexually attractive to men as well as feed babies.”

    In the context of evolution, all visible breasts are ‘large’ compared to the breasts of the other great apes. Breasts that are large by the arbitrary measurements of societal beauty standards are no more sexual than small ones.

    Earlbecke’s comment that “…even by simply, by virtue of nature, having large mammaries (or, indeed, breasts at all), I have no right to complain if others make degrading or unwanted sexual advances.” Is an astute one. Breasts are objectified because they are a visible indicator of one’s ‘femininity’, and in our society to be female is to be an object.

  4. Axel Says:

    Adrian,
    If the best support you can find for an issue of Evolutionary Biology is by a Professor of Economics and Finance, it probably isn’t “widely accepted”.

    Not to mention that the author is a racist & a homophobe!
    http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/BaileyAssociates/HumanBiodiversityGroup-II.html#anchor328323

    Lovely.

Leave a Reply